False Advertising Claims Removed from Pa Hair Products Class Action.

By PJ D’Annunzio (July 14, 2022, 7:30 PM EDT) — A Pennsylvania federal judge on Thursday allowed most claims in a class action lawsuit against a beauty company for allegedly deceptive marketing of hair care products “natural” products containing synthetic ingredients, but rejected the plaintiff’s false advertising claims.

U.S. District Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan said plaintiff Rachel Binakonsky sufficiently alleged unjust enrichment and breach of express warranty claims as well as violations of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act of Pennsylvania v. JM Brands, but had not responded to its false advertising claims because it could not point to specific advertisements promising that the Purezero product line contains no synthetics.

“Most of Ms. Binakonsky’s articles…

Stay one step ahead

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of lawsuits, etc.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, motions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS